🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, the average family pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.