🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from disorder. While he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative rather than debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a selection process with no shortage of contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events stated the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier version prompted local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. Its exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it might seek to examine.